Arpad Toth
My feedback
7 results found
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Arpad Toth commented
PC-lint plus should be better at this.
-
19 votes
Arpad Toth supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Arpad Toth commented
As they say C89 has less undefined behavior.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Arpad Toth commented
I simply merge everything into one file, and only look for diff, unless you need proper justification.
-
16 votes
In PC-lint Plus, suppression options inside a source module do not “leak” to subsequent modules so this is less of an issue for PC-lint Plus than it was for PC-lint but we do plan to add a warning for -save options that do not have corresponding -restore options in a future update to PC-lint Plus.
Arpad Toth supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Arpad Toth commented
This is no easy if you do incemental build, better post process lint results and merge into one, then duplicates are gone, and speed is retained.
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Arpad Toth commented
Or better, provide an external tool that tracks suppressions outside source code.
A proper build system should take care of this, like scons.